[Leaplist] sad state of Linux default desktop installs
Ray Brunkow
ray at brunkow.ws
Sat Sep 12 20:10:29 EDT 2009
Kevin Korb wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I am surprised that they operated that way in the absence of a DHCP
> server. I would fully expect them to just work in the presence of a DHCP
> server but without one they should revert to the old way and prompt you
> for the network information. I would agree completely with your failure
> assessment.
>
That was my thought too. This is what Debian did, and ONLY Debian.
Again a step backwards IMHO for Linux installs.
> BTW, I only put a DHCP server on my LAN because it is required for network
> (PXE) booting. All of my systems have static IPs assigned in the
> dhcpd.conf and my non-network booting systems are configured to just
> ignore the server.
>
> Wifi is different. I actually prefer a DHCP approach there. Mainly
> because everywhere else uses DHCP therefore any wireless device I own will
> be configured for DHCP so I may as well serve the DHCP at my home as
> well. It makes my laptop auto-configure itself for my network and
> auto-configure itself for whatever other network I happen to be using it
> on. It is static too of course.
>
> I don't really consider DHCP or static IPs to be a security feature. I
> consider static IPs to be a convenience that is well worth the tiny amount
> of time required to configure and allocate them.
>
>
I had an issue with neighbors piggybacking on my bandwidth when I was
running DHCP even with WEP (yeah it sucks, but its all my wifi router
offers need to buy a newer one) and no broadcast.
Once I went to static and disabled all DHCP the piggybacking stopped and
has not been an issue since.
I only have 3 computers in my house not including my IPCop as my laptop
is on the fritz and dont have the $$ to fix it or replace it atm.
-snip-
--
Raymond L. Brunkow
5th Degree Black Belt
Certified Instructor
Choong Sil Kwan TaekwonDo Federation
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the Leaplist
mailing list