[Leaplist] Upgrade from Fedora 9 to 11 (or to CentOS 5.3) ....

[William A. Mahaffey III]

On 06/20/09 07:31, Andrew wrote:
>
> On Jun 13, 2009, at 1:38 PM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
>
>> On 06/13/09 11:37, Phil Barnett wrote:
>>> rpm -qa | grep -v fc9
>>
>>
>> Hmmmm (w/o the '-v') ....
>>
>> [root at athloncube:/etc, Sat Jun 13, 12:36 PM] 1006 # rpm -qa | grep  fc9
>> kmod-kqemu-2.6.27.21-78.2.41.fc9.x86_64-1.3.0-0.42.fc9.13.x86_64
>> libXTrap-1.0.0-5.fc9.x86_64
>> kmod-kqemu-2.6.27.24-78.2.53.fc9.x86_64-1.3.0-0.42.fc9.16.x86_64
>> gnome-spell-1.0.8-5.fc9.x86_64
>> smartmontools-config-5.38-2.fc9.x86_64
>> ntp-4.2.4p7-1.fc9.x86_64
>> kmod-kqemu-2.6.27.23-78.2.50.fc9.x86_64-1.3.0-0.42.fc9.15.x86_64
>> ntpdate-4.2.4p7-1.fc9.x86_64
>> libXTrap-devel-1.0.0-5.fc9.x86_64
>> ntp-perl-4.2.4p7-1.fc9.x86_64
>> libXfontcache-1.0.4-5.fc9.x86_64
>> libXfontcache-devel-1.0.4-5.fc9.x86_64
>> pdfcube-0.0.2-8.fc9.x86_64
>> [root at athloncube:/etc, Sat Jun 13, 12:36 PM] 1007 #
>
>
> I have seen packages that did not change between releases keep their 
> previous release designation before, so that's not an absolute 
> guarantee that those packages were missed.  I've even seen "FC" 
> packages in RHEL before.
>
> In this case, though, after a quick spot-check of the F11 package 
> listing, there do not appear to be any "fc9" packages in the final 
> release, so those appear to be valid issues to dig into.
>


Good call. The kqemu stuff apparently shouldn't be there, don't know why 
yum didn't erase it, but I just did (I have been having problems setting 
up kvm VM's, we'll see if this helps). NTP has since been updated as 
well. The rest have no newer packages (as of this A.M.), so I'm leaving 
them alone for now ....

-- 

	William A. Mahaffey III

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------

	"The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war
	 ever devised by man."
                            -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.