[Leaplist] Upgrade from Fedora 9 to 11 (or to CentOS 5.3) ....

[Andrew]

On Jun 13, 2009, at 1:38 PM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:

> On 06/13/09 11:37, Phil Barnett wrote:
>> rpm -qa | grep -v fc9
>
>
> Hmmmm (w/o the '-v') ....
>
> [root at athloncube:/etc, Sat Jun 13, 12:36 PM] 1006 # rpm -qa | grep   
> fc9
> kmod-kqemu-2.6.27.21-78.2.41.fc9.x86_64-1.3.0-0.42.fc9.13.x86_64
> libXTrap-1.0.0-5.fc9.x86_64
> kmod-kqemu-2.6.27.24-78.2.53.fc9.x86_64-1.3.0-0.42.fc9.16.x86_64
> gnome-spell-1.0.8-5.fc9.x86_64
> smartmontools-config-5.38-2.fc9.x86_64
> ntp-4.2.4p7-1.fc9.x86_64
> kmod-kqemu-2.6.27.23-78.2.50.fc9.x86_64-1.3.0-0.42.fc9.15.x86_64
> ntpdate-4.2.4p7-1.fc9.x86_64
> libXTrap-devel-1.0.0-5.fc9.x86_64
> ntp-perl-4.2.4p7-1.fc9.x86_64
> libXfontcache-1.0.4-5.fc9.x86_64
> libXfontcache-devel-1.0.4-5.fc9.x86_64
> pdfcube-0.0.2-8.fc9.x86_64
> [root at athloncube:/etc, Sat Jun 13, 12:36 PM] 1007 #


I have seen packages that did not change between releases keep their  
previous release designation before, so that's not an absolute  
guarantee that those packages were missed.  I've even seen "FC"  
packages in RHEL before.

In this case, though, after a quick spot-check of the F11 package  
listing, there do not appear to be any "fc9" packages in the final  
release, so those appear to be valid issues to dig into.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.