[Leaplist] quick opinions - ubuntu vs. mint
Bryan J. Smith
b.j.smith at ieee.org
Tue Dec 8 11:03:40 EST 2009
Ack! I just broke my own rule! ("I heard" -- bad BS! BAD!)
What I meant to say it that one should check if Mint just merely reuses
Ubuntu's KDE and related packages "as upstream." If that is the case,
I doubt it makes much difference.
In general I don't make a judgment call on distros when it comes to KDE
or GNOME. I've helped others clean up GNOME config/GConf for users
after Ubuntu upgrades much like I have on Fedora. They are distro
agnostic and tied to GNOME changes -- although a distro shouldn't
change major GNOME versions mid-release, and leave it until the next
distro version upgrade (that would be a distro backport-regression
difference that would cause me to consider switching).
I would assume (i.e., I could be totally ignorant) KDE is the same.
Creating a new user typically identifies if it's a change an old user profile
just wouldn't take.
----- Original Message ----
From: Bryan J. Smith <b.j.smith at ieee.org>
Although if Mint is based heavily on Ubuntu, then that won't help. I only
heard Mint does "questionable" package inclusion versus Ubuntu, and
most packages are unchanged.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the Leaplist
mailing list