[Leaplist] RPM Fusion repos now available (merger of Livna and FreshRPMS) ...

Jason Boxman jasonb at edseek.com
Sat Nov 8 13:48:02 EST 2008


On Saturday 08 November 2008 13:05:20 Bryan J. Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 11/8/08, Vernon Singleton <vsingleton at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Ok ... so then, if I have the following repos configured on
> > my fc9 box:
> > fedora-rawhide.repo
> > fedora.repo
> > fedora-updates-newkey.repo
> > fedora-updates.repo
> > fedora-updates-testing-newkey.repo
> > fedora-updates-testing.repo
> > rpmfusion-free-rawhide.repo
> > rpmfusion-free.repo
> > rpmfusion-free-updates.repo
> > rpmfusion-free-updates-testing.repo
> > rpmfusion-nonfree-rawhide.repo
> > rpmfusion-nonfree.repo
> > rpmfusion-nonfree-updates.repo
> > rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing.repo
> >
> > Which appear to include the rpmfusion repos, then why
> > can't I see the
> > 'cinelerra' package I want from freshrpms?
> >
> > # yum list | grep cinellera || echo 'RPM Fusion repos
> > SuX0Rz' !
> > RPM Fusion repos SuX0Rz !
> >
> > What am I doing wrong?
>
> I've already found several packages from Livna and/or FreshRPMS
> are not in RPM Fusion.  Some may be intentional.  Some may be
> still coming.

*shrug*

I've never had an instance of Debian GNU/Linux not Just Working (tm) when 
dealing with packages.  Ever.  I guess posts like these are why I've never 
had any interest in ever investigating a switch to Fedora.

What am I missing?


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



More information about the Leaplist mailing list