[Leaplist] fstab
Jim Hartley
xjimh at cfl.rr.com
Thu May 29 10:25:36 EDT 2008
OK, I see the value for large and/or complex installations. But for the
user who is NOT going to do this stuff, who is never going to move disks
around, and who always wants the NEXT install to look like the previous
one, it's a PITA. Perhaps the solution is to keep the default using
UUIDs, but provide an option during the install process to select "hard
coded devices in fstab". For **MY** personal convenience, I am going to
get rid of the damn LABELs I have now, and when I get around to
installing Fedora 9 (fairly soon) I will just edit fstab to get eid of
the UUIDs.
Some installs DO NOT NEED the extra security - the good ole convenient
way is jes' fine!
Jim Hartley
Bryan J. Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 09:35 -0400, Bryan J. Smith wrote:
>> This is now the default after an install/upgrade because people were
>> often moving storage around (especially SANs) and causing label
>> conflicts, let alone such things aren't an option for direct device
>> entries. ;)
>
> Oh, I forgot the other, mega-biggie ...
>
> Software RAID
>
> Seen too many people toast their Software RAID volumes by direct device
> -- or even just /dev/md* -- access. Not only are hardware devices
> re-ordered, but MD devices as well. UUIDs are not.
>
> You don't like UUID? Again, it's the only "safe" way. Using it by
> default will prevent you from doing a lot of stupid things on your
> system.
>
> Of course, if you like the "old way," you can use those too. But you
> run all sorts of risks if mappings have changed. I assume you always
> remember to mount with "read-only" (-o ro) by default when checking out
> any filesystem as well? ;)
>
>
>
--
Teen Angel - a ghost story - http://teenangel.netfirms.com
More information about the Leaplist
mailing list