[Fwd: Re: [Leaplist] proposed change to LEAP by-laws]

[J.T. Hayden]

Pardon my insertion here, but my recall *and I looked it up*

at the 7/19 meeting, there was a suggestion to change the by-laws and add a
clause which says, basically, that nobody may serve on the election
committee for more than two years in a row. the four current board members
who were present at the meeting agreed to it in principle, however there was
no exact wording agreed upon, so legally it doesn't "count".

the by-laws state that in order for the by-laws to be changed, the following
needs to happen:

- EITHER the change needs to be proposed at an executive committee meeting,
and then voted upon by the executive committee at the FOLLOWING executive
committee meeting;

- OR the change needs to be "sent" to all executive committee members (we've
always assumed that email is okay for this, although the by- laws don't
explicitly say one way or the other) and then voted upon at an executive
committee meeting AT LEAST TEN DAYS AFTER the change was "sent".

There was not a clear acceptance of this because it did not follow current
bylaws, as I am NOT a member, I can not be sure, but seems to ME that all
this on here does not satisfy these conditions, that another meeting has yet
to be made with these conditions followed ....

(please feel free to tell me to shut up, because as I stated I am NOT a
member, nor do I know the standing of any such meetings)


          J.T. Hayden
             KG4BFJ
 
home\office  -  407.891.1835
office\mobile -  407.922.3091

-----Original Message-----
From: leaplist-bounces at leap-cf.org [mailto:leaplist-bounces at leap-cf.org] On
Behalf Of Phil Barnett
Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2007 1:06 AM
To: leaplist at leap-cf.org
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [Leaplist] proposed change to LEAP by-laws]

On Friday 27 July 2007, tonyb wrote:
> The perception is accurate however they could be motivated to not pay
> dues as well as not serve.  I think at that point its LEAP that looses.
>
> Time for a new topic...

So, what you all are suggesting here is that something that was brought up
by 
a member, moved, seconded and passed should be ignored?

I believe that flies in the face of our bylaws.

-- 
Phil Barnett
AI4OF
SKCC #600
_______________________________________________
Leaplist mailing list
Leaplist at leap-cf.org
http://lists.leap-cf.org/mailman/listinfo/leaplist