[Fwd: Re: [Leaplist] proposed change to LEAP by-laws]

[Phil Barnett]

On Friday 27 July 2007, tonyb wrote:
> The perception is accurate however they could be motivated to not pay
> dues as well as not serve.  I think at that point its LEAP that looses.
>
> Time for a new topic...

So, what you all are suggesting here is that something that was brought up by 
a member, moved, seconded and passed should be ignored?

I believe that flies in the face of our bylaws.

-- 
Phil Barnett
AI4OF
SKCC #600