[Fwd: Re: [Leaplist] proposed change to LEAP by-laws]

[tonyb]

Phil Barnett wrote:
> On Friday 27 July 2007, Hank Lambert wrote:
> 
>> I'm not a paid member yet, but I would have to agree. All board positions
>> have various levels of involvement, but all of them directly support the
>> club. If someone is very happy in their current position, and there isn't
>> anyone who wants that position, I think forcing that person out would be a
>> huge disservice to the group as a whole. If someone else wants it, that is
>> what the vote is for.
> 
> I believe the common perception is that some members may view the election 
> committee as a place to hide from being nominated for the Board of Directors.
> 

The perception is accurate however they could be motivated to not pay
dues as well as not serve.  I think at that point its LEAP that looses.

Time for a new topic...

-- 
May all your bits be in the correct order.