[Leaplist] FC6 conversion from Ubuntu? -- what FC6 "registration"?
Bryan J. Smith
b.j.smith at ieee.org
Sat Nov 11 15:15:06 EST 2006
On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 21:37 -0500, Marc wrote:
> Attack me if you want, not a pissing contest I assure you.
Huh? Please point out where I allegedly "attacked" you?
About the only two "flamatory" statements I made where ...
"Translation: PISS ... I'M DISTRO PISSING ...."
and
"Maybe you should check your facts before distro pissing next time?"
Given your "vague facts" to this point, I won't comment further except for ...
> As for the 'registration' topic - it was on the RH/Fedora lists
> recently - IIRC it was some sort of user registration/tracking scheme.
> I can't find the link on the web either. Search the lists and you
> will find what I am talking about. Apparrently they *did* back off on
> it - that I am glad to hear.
First off, you said it went in to the release. Since then, you've
backtracked.
Understand I'm _on_ RH/Fedora lists (more than 2 dozen)! And I didn't
see this "discussion."
It sounds like people confused on the new Internet-aware Anaconda
facilities that "register" with the Fedora Project (which are Red
Hat-owned/maintained) servers for Fedora Core updates, Fedora Extras
additions, etc... That's _new_ in Fedora Core 6.
I don't know how many times Red Hat does something and the pundits blow
it out-of-proportion. Like "Blue Curve" -- it was a _theme_! It merely
created a common theme for GNOME and KDE. And Red Hat was the first to
admit they had far more GNOME developers than KDE developers on-staff,
hence their bias when it comes to icons, default apps, etc...
So again, _please_ give me some links. I'm not asking because I'm
trying to be a "hard ass" -- but so I am aware of any privacy issues.
That's all!
More information about the Leaplist
mailing list